ANC Forum in regards of Corruption
you do not say you will stamp out corruption, because We've all heard that and that is a lie, and corruption cannot be uprooted without personal cost like what happened to Lt. Senior Grade Nancy Gandian.
First. Explain that there is should be an study concerning where there is corruption (graft, mis-allocation of funds, conficting interests, rigged biddings etc...), inefficiency and corruption that came about the government inefficiency. To generalize it simply is just playing to the crowd and grants no credibility.
Second. In efficiency can be remedied and once this action takes into effect, the repercussions are a lower tolerance of corruption as well as eliminating corruption that stem from inefficiency (red tape). Efficiency creates a structure by which creates a greater circumstance of liability and responsibility and thus begin the slow but steady progress towards remedying corruptions.
You cannot just remove corruption just because you say so, you affect change that will reverberate through the status quo. Crucifying anyone who "breaks" regulation without understanding the circumstance is an oversimplification and will affect those who are fudging the rules to get the Job done. What people need to break the rules to do get the job done: YES they DO, because this is a very inefficient bureacracy and its regulations are not only outdated but filled with loopholes.
First. Explain that there is should be an study concerning where there is corruption (graft, mis-allocation of funds, conficting interests, rigged biddings etc...), inefficiency and corruption that came about the government inefficiency. To generalize it simply is just playing to the crowd and grants no credibility.
Second. In efficiency can be remedied and once this action takes into effect, the repercussions are a lower tolerance of corruption as well as eliminating corruption that stem from inefficiency (red tape). Efficiency creates a structure by which creates a greater circumstance of liability and responsibility and thus begin the slow but steady progress towards remedying corruptions.
You cannot just remove corruption just because you say so, you affect change that will reverberate through the status quo. Crucifying anyone who "breaks" regulation without understanding the circumstance is an oversimplification and will affect those who are fudging the rules to get the Job done. What people need to break the rules to do get the job done: YES they DO, because this is a very inefficient bureacracy and its regulations are not only outdated but filled with loopholes.
Comments
Post a Comment