Annoying Irrationalities

Basically threads that some annoying irrationalities about GOd. What I mean by irrationalities, I mean clearly jumping to conclusions and not sorting out the other possibilities: Chance and Complexity.
http://www.filipinofreethinkers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=1329


The Telelogical Argument is very strong argument of WANTING there to be god. Concepts like Order, design etc. are very relative and are human measures and descriptions. The arguments lists these things and say - There must have been a designer... As a history buff, shit that happened in history just happened because a couple of factors got together and BOOM. Same thing can be said with chemistry and the artificial of RNA

Also it LEAPS into assuming we are or we have been the only life. As scientists figure out that life is not that special, there is a chance many times it has occurred and possibly of greater complexity than our own.

Cognitive Biases at play, and must be accounted for or eliminated in order to make a more rational argument. In this case, "The greatest show on earth" by Richard Dawkins does it very succintly, he writes with keeping in mind not only justify every point, but to have many other elements to support it.

Confirmation bias – the tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions
Congruence bias – the tendency to test hypotheses exclusively through direct testing, in contrast to tests of possible alternative hypotheses.
Experimenter's or Expectation bias – the tendency for experimenters to believe, certify, and publish data that agree with their expectations for the outcome of an experiment, and to disbelieve, discard, or downgrade the corresponding weightings for data that appear to conflict with those expectations.
Focusing effect – the tendency to place too much importance on one aspect of an event; causes error in accurately predicting the utility of a future outcome
Ambiguity effect – the tendency to avoid options for which missing information makes the probability seem "unknown
Anchoring effect – the tendency to rely too heavily, or "anchor," on a past reference or on one trait or piece of information when making decisions (also called "insufficient adjustment").
Attentional bias – the tendency to neglect relevant data when making judgments of a correlation or association. Very selective on sources regarding experts in Cosmology.
Pareidolia – a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) is perceived as significant, e.g., seeing images of animals or faces in clouds, the man in the moon, and hearing hidden messages on records played in reverse.
Subadditivity effect – the tendency to judge probability of the whole to be less than the probabilities of the parts.
Subjective validation – perception that something is true if a subject's belief demands it to be true. Also assigns perceived connections between coincidences.
Attribute substitution – making a complex, difficult judgement by unconsciously substituting an easier judgement
A successful skeptic breaks certainty to pieces, all we really have are emotional and irrational notions of what is true... its better honest with ourselves about it than delusional.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Technically I'm done with the project

Gurps Mysteries

330mg of Caffeine will do the trick