Burden of Proof.
Hay nako. If God was only visible then the burden of proof would be for the atheists. As every religous would key in, "look at the world". I have to say, that assumes God via inference. One has to prove there is a God in the first place. So the burden of Proof is with the Theists.
If God is everywhere, then where ever I am, I should be able to DIRECTLY see and God. The burden of proof is contrary to what is obvious, NOT what is culturally instilled. God is a cultural idea, its not even easily explained through inference, when there is so much science about everything already.
Matatawag akong Pilosopo, but I have to say in other arguments like RH, I had to bring a ton of science when we should be deferring to the established ideas of Science not CULTURE (in the case of burden of proof).
Comments
Post a Comment