Burden of Proof.

Hay nako. If God was only visible then the burden of proof would be for the atheists. As every religous would key in, "look at the world". I have to say, that assumes God via inference. One has to prove there is a God in the first place. So the burden of Proof is with the Theists.

If God is everywhere, then where ever I am, I should be able to DIRECTLY see and God. The burden of proof is contrary to what is obvious, NOT what is culturally instilled. God is a cultural idea, its not even easily explained through inference, when there is so much science about everything already.

Matatawag akong Pilosopo, but I have to say in other arguments like RH, I had to bring a ton of science when we should be deferring to the established ideas of Science not CULTURE (in the case of burden of proof).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Technically I'm done with the project

Gurps Mysteries

330mg of Caffeine will do the trick